09:00 [p134] Stancetaking in narratives of experience with “food justice”: An interactional discourse analysis of a public policy initiative.
Jennifer Sclafani

09:20 [p116]Addressing Face-Threats of Unsolicited Advice: Doctors’ Use of Politeness Strategies in Clinical Interactions on Weight Loss.
Liliia Bespala, M. Meyerhoff, Charlotte Albury

09:40 [p132]Reframing NHS complaints final response letters through a conversational lens.
Bethan Benwell, Catrin Rhys

10:00 [p78] Conceptualizing professional listening in doctor’s consultations.
Jenny Paananen, Aija Logren

10:20 [p149] Asking about drug allergies: Managing antimicrobial medicines-related risks in primary care in England and Sweden.
Anna Lindström

09:00 [p18] Interactivity in academic lectures through the lenses of metadiscourse.
Basma Bouziri

09:20 [p67] Academic and lay researchers’ discussions in a Citizen Sociolinguistic project – How linguistic knowledge is handled and challenged.
Kaarina Hippi, J. Vaattovaara

09:40 [p186] Joint accounting for favorite artworks.
Sara Rönnqvist

10:00 [p195] Resistance shaping the development of ideas in Sloyd.
Elisabet Jagell

10:20 [p81] What does it mean to work as a team? Participation frameworks in primary school children’s peer-interaction.
Daniela Veronesi, M. Simone

09:00 [p101] Ethnicity-based categorization in storying experiences of problematic interactions.
Annika Valtonen

09:20 [p105] Climate activists’ civil disobedience at the interface of proximal and distal deontics.
Simon Magnusson, M. Stevanovic, T. Ahopelto

09:40 [p 217] Building strategic narrative for climate neutrality in Latvia: communication challenges in pursuing its climate goals.
V. Kleinberga, L. Metla-Rozentāle, K. Blumfelde-Rutka, E. Dāce, I. Skulte

10:00 p207] "We're on the same side, right?": Constructing epistemic invitations in Finnish Reddit.
Laura Lehmuskoski, Ü. Bedretdin

10:20 [p59] Opinion articles as a forum for ideologies and discourses on platform work.
Marja I. Rautajoki

09:00 [p82] From joint reference to conjunctions: Yup'ik demonstratives in discourse cohesion.
Nicholas G. Toler

09:20 [p155] Conventional implicatures and language contact: discourse markers in Sanna.
Hana El Shazli

09:40 [p 137] Syntax-level temporal variation in Modern Finnish.
Terhi Hartikainen, O. Kuparinen, J. Santaharju, J. Peltonen, S. Knuutila, L. Mustanoja, U. Leino

10:00 [p127] Modulation markers, inference markers and connectives in the requests for confirmation in everyday Estonian.
Tiit Hennoste, A. Rääbis, K. Laanesoo-Kalk, P. Upser

10:20 [p177] Pragmatic functions of the evaluative marker zhende (shi) 真的（是）in Taiwan Mandarin Chinese.
Chiara Piccinini

09:00 [p97] Developing resilience skills in simulator-based training of future mariners.
Aud Marit Wahl, M. Giskeødegård

09:20 [p23]The interactional accomplishment of caring for a mannequin in simulation-based nurse training.
Charlott Sellberg

09:40 [p98] Supporting medical reasoning through shifts in footing: The facilitator role in simulation-based training for medical students.
Gøril Thomassen Hammerstad, Kristin Halvorsen

10:00 [p206] Instructional interventions in military wargaming: A study of embodied feedback practices in naval officer education.
Björn Sjöblom, U. Bennerstedt

09:00 [p79] Investigating Situated Practices of Access-Making with People with Disabilities Using Access Technology at Work.
Barbara N. Carreras, B. Due, M. Hirvonen, S. Merlino, D. Schulz-Budick

09:20 [89] Interactive meaning constitution and meaning negotiation in asymmetric workplace interactions.
Dorothée Schulz-Budick, M. Hirvonen, B. Carreras, B. Due, S. Merlino

09:40 [p96] Defining disability from within and in social interaction through the study of workplace settings.
Sara Merlino, B. Carreras, B. Due, M. Hirvonen, D. Schulz-Budick

10:00 [p66] Professionals use of hypothetical active-voicing in social services.
Madeleine Wirzén

10:20 [p203] Involvement in children’s and young adults’ casefiles.
Winnie Collin

13:00 [p160] Asking About Violence in Antenatal Care.
Marit Halvorsen, M. Lukasse, A.M. Landmark

13:20 [p118]Educating chronically ill cancer patients in pain management: the role of discussion about daily agenda.
Aija Logren, Jenny Paananen

13:40 [p63] Healthcare professionals' writing practices and patients' ability to read and interpret health information in patient portals.
Heidi Gilstad

14:00 [p197] Oral health literacy among adolescents using an online Q&A service.
Kari Sand, E. Lassemo, M. Høiseth

13:00 [p38] “I LOVE YOU” – The Case of Human-AI Attachment.
Jeanette Landgrebe

13:20 [p70] The naturalness of anthropomorphism: a theoretical discussion based on videorecorded human-humanoid interactions.
Brian Due, D. Rudaz

13:40 [p99] Sure I can help you! Language as a trigger for anthropomorphization.
Tanya K. Christensen, K. Moos

13:00 [p215] Analyzing the relevance of recipients’ visible participation during “the whiles of signed interaction”.
Johan Hjulstad

13:20 [p172] Mutual orientation among NTS signing construction workers.
Kristian Skedsmo

13:40 [p125] Acquiring new interactional competences in visual communication: Deaf signers as coaches to non-deaf employees for improved practices in online meetings.
E. Tapio, M. Hirvonen, J. Keränen, A. Korhonen, N. Lilja

14:00 [p 182] Other-repetitions in Norwegian Sign Language Conversations: Language Contact as a Reflection of the Norwegian Language Ecology.
Brittany Arnold

13:00 [p 146] ‘Free’ infinitives in German and Polish.
J. Zinken, P. Urbanik, M. Weidner

13:20 [p61] Perceptual chunking of multiunit turns - prosody and syntax in interplay.
Tiia Winther-Jensen

13:40 [p148] Emerging narratives: Grammatical and embodied resources for building multi-unit turns.
Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, K. Suomalainen

14:00 [p87] Multiple buts and yeah buts across turns: Turn-initial particles as a means of calibrating (dis)agreements and turn-entry devices.
František Tůma, L. Kääntä, T. Jakonen

13:00 [p139] Giving and Receiving Negative Feedback in Student Teams.
Hanne Rustad, B. Liebech-Lien

13:20 [p176] Exploring teacher educators' writing-oriented language about students' academic writing.
Ingunn Ofte

13:40 [p19] Examining Future Teachers’ Sense-Making in Multicultural Classroom Conflicts: A Discourse-Based Study Across Greece, Norway, and Türkiye.
Nur Y. Aptoula, T. Løge Hagen, M. Heldal, K. Magos

14:00 [p62] Exploring the ideology of authenticity in reading group discussions on literary dialect.
Laura K.K. Tammilehto

13:00 [p50] Decision-making in coaching sessions of homeless people.
Kaat De Gueldre, D. Van De Mieroop, M. De Dijn

13:20 [p71] “Sounds like a really scary time for you”: Affective inferences as transition devices in helpline calls about suicide.
Marc Alexander, S. Ellung Jørgensen

13:40 [p32] Reportative evidentials during emergency call transfer in French.
Marine Riou

14:00 [p128] Compliments in Telephone and Chat-based Counseling: a Conversation Analytic Study.
Maartje E. Roodzant, W. Stommel, B. Huma, M. Rickert

[p86] Rejection of citizens’ ideas in opening and closing the idea development in participatory budgeting workshops.
Elina Salomaa, L. Kääntä

15:20 [p20] The interactional organization of language management in online project meetings.
Kaisa S. Pietikäinen

15:40 [p174] The interactional work of chairing: Facilitating coconstruction of knowledge in healthcare meetings.
Karoliina Marttinen

16:00 [p 68] Constructed Argumentation in Election Debates.
Corina Andone, M. Reijven

16:20 [p48] The argumentative power of the WAR metaphor in Serbian lithium mining discourse.
Tatjana Đurović, N. Silaški

16:40 [p152] Hate Speech in Disguise.
Jurate Ruzaite

17:00 [p157] The discourses of coimagined futures: Coffee talk.
Esra Efeoglu, B. Eroz, B. Basaran Uysa

15:00 [p39] Implementing the AI Hype into the Workplace: The Discursive Construction of the AI Consulting Market.
Matias A. Eilola

15:20 [p40] Simulating political dialogue with AI: Citizens’ questions to the candidates’ AI clones in Finnish presidential election.
Riikka Nissi, M. Siitonen, M. Raappana

15:40 [p117] Human – chatbot interaction: The case of disinformation in large language models.
Silje S. Alvestad, N. Poldvere, A. Følstad, P. Bae Brandtzæg

16:00 [p73] CA-Squared: Advances and Applications of Researcher-first Computer-Assisted Conversation Analysis.
Numa P. Markee, L. Angrave

16:20 [p184] Embodying driverless shuttles.
Jakub Mlynar, B. Nanchen, L. Ehrenzeller

16:40 [p8] Mobile discursive placemaking on the ocean: Multisensory semiotic landscapes as safaris in the Arctic.
Giuanna Caviezel, G. Caviezel

15:00 [p191] Diverse compositions in interpreter-mediated deafhearing interaction.
Minttu Laine

15:20 [p204] Haptices as a communicative resource.
Magnhild R. Michalsen

15:40 [p170] Utterance semiotics as recipient design in signed-tospoken interpreting.
Vibeke Bø

16:00 [p120] Gaze direction as framing for interaction in sign language interpreted routine postnatal visits.
Marita Løkken

16:20 [p179] Multimodality in interpreted interaction: Interlocutors’ combined use of different multimodal resources and interpreters’ strategies regarding role distribution/footing during interpreted GP-encounters.
Silje O. Strand

16:40 [p187] Interpreter-initiated multiple repair sequences in mediation discussions.
Annukka Saarenmaa

15:00 [p156] Structural alignment with projected continuation, in Norwegian and Spanish.
Paul Sbertoli-Nielsen

15:20 [p212] ‘Øh, ja’ – of course ‘ja’ can be used like this!
Maria Jørgensen

15:40 [p 103] Structures that enable the timing of shared laughter in conversation.
Richard Ogden

16:00 [p107] When is it “haha” and when is it “hahaha”: What affects the duration of laughter?
Andra Annuka-Loik

16:20 [p143] Responding to suspensions: sequential implicativeness and displays of affect in family interaction.
Anna Vatanen, P. Haddington

16:40 [p90] Task Instructions and Repair in Multilingual Interaction on Construction Sites.
Regina Göke

17:00 [p83] Cross-linguistic variation in multimodal feedback in conversation.
Anastasia Bauer, S. Gipper, A. Mitchell, A. Witzlack-Makarevich

15:00 [p52] “You don’t want to say any more do you?” Asking and answering questions in viva voce examinations.
L. Walz, M. Skender-Lizatovic, B. Huma, S. Gibson, M. Alexander

15:20 [p192] How do students display interactional competence in “subject talks”?
Marit S. Solem

15:40 [p112] Serving up closings: Coordinating the ending of preschool meals.
Jakob Cromdal, S. Wiggins, A. Willemsen

16:00 [p102] Embodied initiations in classroom: From co-presence to focused interaction in peer groups.
Kreeta Niemi, I. Rautiainen, J. Mustakallio

16:20 [p124] 'Alright' in the English-as-Second-Language classroom interaction: a multimodal analysis.
Christl Langer, T. Malabarba

16:40 [p133] Challenges associated with language variation in interactions between L1 and L2 speakers of Norwegian.
Nicole L. Busby, A. Dahl, K. Listhaug, A. Angelsen, G. Nygård

17:00 [p166] Young Leaners’ Agency: Footing and Voice in bilinguals’ (Swedish-Chinese) Heritage Language Learning.
Zejia Xu, A. Evaldsson

15:00 [p178] User involvement of persons with aphasia in analyzing conversational data.
Helene Killmer, R. Groenewold

15:20 [p144] Involving people with dementia in applied conversation analytic research.
Ingvild Winsnes, A. Volkmer

15:40 [p171] Autism in interaction: How conversation analytic research on autism can benefit from participatory research.
Karianne Skovholt, A. Dalby Landmark, L. Eilertsen, K. Larsen, J. Lester

16:00 [p145] Co-production of knowledge on cluttering-in-interaction in a videobased (CARM) workshop.
R.O. Sikveland, A. Dalby Landmark, H. Sønsterud

16:20 [p209] “Being with, Discovering with”: Challenges of Participatory EMCA with People Living with Dementia.
Ali Reza Majlesi

16:40 [p43] Whose co-production, whose analysis? Collaboration between academics and their partners in impactful conversation analytic research.
Elizabeth Stokoe