Example of sustainability analysis - Digital inclusion of the elderly (Hauge 2024, Master's thesis) - header

Example of sustainability analysis - Digital inclusion of the elderly (Hauge 2024, Master's thesis)


Example of sustainability analysis - Digital inclusion of the elderly (Hauge 2024, Master's thesis) - content

Digital Inclusion of Older Adults

Author: Ingvild Solheim Hauge

NTNU Open: Digital Inclusion of Older Adults

Short Description

Topic: Digital inclusion of older adults; examines the use of tools and training initiatives

Type of assignment: Technology introduction

Abstract

Modern society is increasingly technology-driven, which increases the need for digital competence to keep up. In this context, many older adults experience difficulties participating in the digital society, putting them at risk of digital exclusion. Previous research shows this is a widespread societal problem, and the consequences may include reduced quality of life and socio-economic challenges. Prior studies also describe measures that promote digital inclusion for vulnerable groups and outline how society should take action. The development of new technologies has led to changes in how users interact with digital services, offering increased usability and accommodation of users’ needs.

This study aims to provide new empirical insight into how older adults experience digital exclusion and inclusion in today’s society and to shed light on the underlying factors. This was studied by examining the use of digital tools and training initiatives among older Norwegians. It also investigated the extent to which existing training programs influenced the digital daily life of older adults and identified potential areas for improvement.

This case study is based on qualitative data: interviews and observations during digital training courses, as well as interviews with staff involved in digital guidance and senior researchers on digital exclusion. The findings highlighted a significant need for digital training among older adults and that many older adults wish to participate in the digital society. Further, factors for optimal digital training were identified, along with the needs and preferences of older adults, which can inform the development of technological solutions to promote inclusion.

Sustainability Analysis

Assumptions / Preconditions

The analysis is based on a scenario where training in digital tools for older adults works effectively and where the tools have a universal design suitable for most older adults.

This assignment focuses on digital inclusion of older adults and how it can be achieved through training in relevant digital tools. Thus, it has a clear sustainability profile with a focus on the human dimension of sustainability.

The following assumptions were made in the sustainability analysis:

  • The solution under consideration (center of the diagram) consists of the tools together with training in the tools.
  • The analysis is based on a scenario where training in the tools and the use of the tools is effective. This is reflected in two sustainability effects on the technical dimension: Tools are universally designed, and Relevant training is provided.
  • Even in this initially positive scenario, both positive and negative sustainability effects can be imagined.

Individual Impacts, Immediate

  • I11: Older adults experience mastery when learning to use tools
  • II2: Increased confidence when interacting with digital solutions

These immediate positive effects can lead to enabling effects on the same dimension (illustrated with arrows in the diagram):

Individual Impacts, Enabling

  • IE1: Ability to communicate digitally with family and services
  • IE2: Increased sense of belonging and social value
  • IE3: Improved digital competence

As a consequence of older adults’ ability to participate in society, there can be systemic effects on the human dimension:

Individual Impacts, Structural

  • IS1: Increased agency and better mental health
  • IS2: Long-term enhancement of quality of life and independence
  • IS3: Increased participation in societal decisions through digital inclusion

These structural effects can in turn enable further effects on the same dimension:

Social Impacts, Enabling

  • SE1: Older adults can use tools
  • SE2: Increased human contact through tool usage
  • SE3: Ability to participate in society

As a consequence of older adults’ societal participation, structural social effects occur:

Social Impacts, Structural

  • SS1: Strengthened social cohesion
  • SS2: Well-functioning democracy
  • SS3: Reduced social isolation among older adults

Agency and health of older adults also have enabling economic effects:

Economic Impacts, Enabling

  • EcE1: Reduced need for healthcare services

This in turn leads to systemic economic effects:

Economic Impacts, Structural

  • ES1: Economy adapted to an aging population

The participation of older adults in society, together with available resources for other societal tasks, influences environmental decisions:

Environmental Impacts, Enabling

  • EnE1: Environmental measures receive sufficient resources
  • EnE2: Good environmental decision-making

Systemic effects on the environment can then occur:

Environmental Impacts, Structural

  • EnS1: Sufficient prioritization of the environment

However, positive immediate effects can also lead to negative outcomes if some older adults are still unable to use the tools. This may increase exclusion for those affected. Additionally, tool usage could replace human contact, negatively impacting societal participation:

Individual Impacts, Negative (Enabling)

  • IE4: Older adults cannot use specific tools
  • IE5: Reduced human contact (where tools replace or support such contact)
  • IE6: Lower ability to participate in society
  • IE7: Weakened agency and health

Consequently, structural social negative effects may occur:

Social Impacts, Negative (Structural)

  • SS4: Groups are excluded
  • SS5: Less effective democracy

Weakened agency and health also affect economic outcomes:

Economic Impacts, Negative (Enabling / Structural)

  • EcE2: Increased need for healthcare services
  • ES2: Economy struggles to adapt to an aging population

 

Negative impacts on democracy and participation, together with high healthcare demands, can affect environmental outcomes:

Environmental Impacts, Negative (Enabling / Structural)

  • EnE3: Environmental measures receive fewer resources
  • EnE4: Poor environmental decision-making
  • EnS2: Insufficient prioritization of the environment

 

In table form: 

ID Impact Level Affects +/−
II1 Older adults experience mastery when learning to use tools Immediate   +
II2 Increased confidence when interacting with digital solutions Immediate   +
IE1 Ability to communicate digitally with family and services Enabling   +
IE2 Increased sense of belonging and social value Enabling   +
IE3 Improved digital competence Enabling   +
IS1 Increased agency and better mental health Structural   +
IS2 Long-term enhancement of quality of life and independence Structural   +
IS3 Increased participation in societal decisions through digital inclusion Structural   +
SI1 Universally designed Immediate   +
SI2 Relevant training provided Immediate   +
SE1 Older adults can use tools Enabling   +
SE2 Increased human contact through tool usage Enabling   +
SE3 Ability to participate in society Enabling   +
SS1 Strengthened social cohesion Structural   +
SS2 Well-functioning democracy Structural EnE2 +
SS3 Reduced social isolation among older adults Structural   +
EcE1 Reduced need for healthcare services Enabling EnE1, EcS1 +
ES1 Economy adapted to an aging population Structural   +
EnE1 Environmental measures receive sufficient resources Enabling   +
EnE2 Good environmental decision-making Enabling EnS1 +
EnS1 Sufficient prioritization of the environment Structural   +
IE4 Older adults cannot use specific tools Enabling SS4 -
IE5 Reduced human contact Enabling   -
IE6 Lower ability to participate in society Enabling   -
IE7 Weakened agency and health Enabling   -
SS4 Groups are excluded Structural   -
SS5 Less effective democracy Structural EnE4 -
EcE2 Increased need for healthcare services Enabling   -
ES2 Economy struggles to adapt to an aging population Structural EcE2, EnE3 -
EnE3 Environmental measures receive fewer resources Enabling   -
EnE4 Poor environmental decision-making Enabling EnS2 -
MS2 Insufficient prioritization of the environment Structural   -

 

Partners

Partners