Navigation

  • Skip to Content
NTNU Home NTNU Home

ROSS Gemini Centre

  • Studies
    • Master's programmes in English
    • For exchange students
    • PhD opportunities
    • All programmes of study
    • Courses
    • Financing
    • Language requirements
    • Application process
    • Academic calendar
    • FAQ
  • Research and innovation
    • NTNU research
    • Research excellence
    • Strategic research areas
    • Innovation resources
    • PhD opportunities
  • Life and housing
    • Student in Trondheim
    • Student in Gjøvik
    • Student in Ålesund
    • For researchers
    • Life and housing
  • About NTNU
    • Contact us
    • Faculties and departments
    • Libraries
    • International researcher support
    • Vacancies
    • About NTNU
    • Maps
  1. ROSS Gemini Centre Publications Books Risk Assessment
  2. Table of Contents
  3. chapt04

Språkvelger

Risk measure - ROSS

×
  • Background
  • ROSS members
  • Studies and Courses
  • Research
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Journal and conference articles
    • Doctoral Dissertations
    • ROSS Reports
    • Slides
    • MSc Theses
  • Resources
  • Conferences
  • Links
MENU

How to Measure and Evaluate Risk?

Chapter 4

How to Measure and Evaluate Risk?

 This page provides additional information to Chapter 4 of the book Risk Assessment; Theory, Methods, and Applications

Back to Table of contents

Section 4.4 

- Nuclear Accidents
The severity of nuclear accidents is often classified according to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES). This scale has eight levels:

7. Major accident (so far only Chernobyl and Fukushima)
6. Serious accident
5. Accident with wider consequences
4. Accident with local consequences
3. Serious incident
2. Incident
1. Anomaly
0. Deviation (no safety significance)

 

Additional reading

  • HSE RR703: Societal risk
  • HSE (1992): The Tolerability of Risk from Nuclear Power Stations
  • HSE (2001): Reducing Risk, Protecting People (r2p2)
  • Land-use planning guideline - for the Seveso II directive
  • HSE (2001): A Guide to Measuring Healty & Safety Performance
  • Johansen, I.L. (2010) Foundations and Fallacies of Risk Acceptance Criteria. ROSS Report
  • Johansen, I.L. and M. Rausand (2012) Risk Metrics: Interpretation and Choice
    [Proc. of the 2012 IEEE IEEM pp. 1914-1918, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEEM). Hong Kong, Dec. 10-13, 2012. ISBN: 978-1-4673-2944-6]
  • Acceptance Criteria in Denmark and the EU (2009)
  • ALARP Guidance note, GN0166, NOPSEMA (2012)

ROSS Logo (headline hidden)

Risk Assessment

book cover. Photo.

NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology

  • For employees
  • |
  • For students
  • |
  • Intranet
  • |
  • Blackboard

Studies

  • Master's programmes in English
  • For exchange students
  • PhD opportunities
  • Courses
  • Career development
  • Continuing education
  • Application process

News

  • NTNU News
  • Vacancies

About NTNU

  • About the university
  • Libraries
  • NTNU's strategy
  • Research excellence
  • Strategic research areas
  • Organizational chart

Contact

  • Contact NTNU
  • Employees
  • Find experts
  • Press contacts
  • Researcher support
  • Maps

NTNU in three cities

  • NTNU in Gjøvik
  • NTNU in Trondheim
  • NTNU in Ålesund

About this website

  • Use of cookies
  • Accessibility statement
  • Privacy policy
  • Editorial responsibility
Facebook Instagram Linkedin Snapchat Tiktok Youtube
Sign In
NTNU logo